I don't think it's fair to - the concept might be worthy of a DD but the people entering it don't get the attention they deserve.

It's unfair to give a DD to a project since only the host gets the attention.

Yes it's a good way to feature a lot of people because most of the people who takes a look at featured deviation usualy press the links to other work so those people will get a feature too.

Yes then the entire project will get more entrys.

No the artist wont be able to get a DD on his own work

2/3 so yes

I say yes, it's perfectly okay for projects to get DDs, AS LONG AS the project host properly attributes the contributing artists. Like you did with the emote shelter project!

'ton earth is a dd?

no, because there arent always the best works in projects...

Personally, I don't believe they should. The individual gets the exposure more or less.

However, it really does bring a lot of exposure to the project: look at the tower project or the :tardwallpaper: project. All the attention came from the DD, even when it still isn't finished. It really boosted it: after all, a DD is actually a feature.

It does take time to run a project as well. I hate running mine, but it's something I have to do everynoe and then to keep the community. Also, projects that can be finished I think may be alright to feature: an end result really helps the impact on a project.

The project has to be something like th :tower: project or :tardwallpaper:. They have liek, 2000+ emotes (at least mine does. )