That's like saying should there be a maximum amount of favs a DD can get. If someone has worked enough to produce something people want to display then good on em- put those sour grapes down ;D
Ah, yes I agree, I didnt realise this was the problem, but limiting the number of groups- i still say no- it's unnecessary censoring, I think artists are censored enough these days without being sensored just because people cant be bothered to scroll down. We live in a world where impatience and doing everything faster is our culture- maybe we just need to slow down a bit.
It gets a bit ridiculous when there's 50 groups displayed down the side. Though i would settle for just showing say 5 groups at a time and having a chance to 'list all'
I dont think there should be... But I TOTALLY agree with what =davecheesefish said about the number of icon next to the deviation. Maybe after about 10 groups or so, a link that shows all groups in a different window.
I don't think there should be a limit on the number of groups you can submit to - after all, if it's relevant to a group why shouldn't it be in there? There should be a limit on the number of group icons it displays next to a deviation though
Devious Comments
But I TOTALLY agree with what =davecheesefish said about the number of icon next to the deviation.
Maybe after about 10 groups or so, a link that shows all groups in a different window.
There should be a limit on the number of group icons it displays next to a deviation though
Because I believe in humans (aka deviants) having the brains to having some common sen..
oh forget it
I mean sure the deviant realizes they might need to improve when it's in 10 groups and no comments and 2 faves?